How ‘The Apprentice’ Can Fix Our Democracy

We need a better debate format — maybe it’s been right in front of us all along

Matt Herlihy
GEN

--

Donald Trump, Stefani Schaeffer, and Ivanka Trump during “The Apprentice” Season 6 Finale. Photo: Mathew Imaging/Getty Images

“We cannot afford, suddenly, to treat this like a reality show.”

- President Barack Obama, September 13, 2016

AsAs debate season approaches again, we’re reminded of how inadequate the practice is for helping voters make actual decisions. Whether the stage holds two dozen hopefuls or a pair of finalists, debates teach us little. Facts go unchecked, bloviation is unpunished, and meaningful exchange is paltry by design.

We’re also reminded that running for president and actually doing the job require vastly different skill sets. Tarmac rallies serve no purpose in grasping the nuances of foreign affairs. Corn dogs and baby kissing are useless in times of crisis. In no other industry is a job interview process so detached from the work itself.

These two problems go virtually undisputed in American life. We concede them as compromises inherent to democracy as we know it. But with the consequences of a flawed campaigning system now in sharp relief — and the current stakes unquestionably high — it’s time to consider a new option for giving voters real perspective on their choice.

Painful as it is to say, we need a…

--

--

GEN
GEN

Published in GEN

A former publication from Medium about politics, power, and culture. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Matt Herlihy
Matt Herlihy

Written by Matt Herlihy

Brand philosopher. Author, speaker, and instructor.