Is Nuclear Energy the ‘Real Green New Deal’?

The Trump administration may back nuclear, but it still faces an uphill battle in the U.S.

Mallory Pickett
GEN

--

Nos. 3 and 4 reactors at the Vogtle nuclear power plant in Burke County, Georgia (2013). Photo: Kyodo News/Getty Images

The Trump administration—the same people who pulled out of the Paris Agreement, rolled back the Clean Power Plan, and reduced fuel-economy regulations—has become an unlikely champion of at least one source for climate change mitigation: nuclear power.

Late last year, Trump signed into law two bipartisan bills to encourage research and innovation in nuclear energy. In late March of this year, Energy Secretary Rick Perry announced that the Trump administration would be guaranteeing $3.7 billion in loans to finish building two new reactors at the Vogtle plant in Georgia. That same week, Edward McGinnis, the DOE’s principal deputy assistant secretary for nuclear energy, told CNBC that the State Department would be expanding talks for cooperation and memorandums of understanding with countries interested in nuclear power. The idea would be to cultivate clients for the “next generation of nuclear power,” which McGinnis hopes will come from the U.S.—and to ensure American influence on nuclear material proliferation.

Unlike coal or natural gas, nuclear doesn’t generate any carbon emissions. And unlike carbon-free renewables like wind or solar, it can produce electricity 24/7…

--

--