Teens Are at the Forefront of Political Engagement — So Let Them Vote

There are no good reasons to prohibit 16-year-olds from voting

Kelli María Korducki
GEN

--

Students participate in the Global Climate Strike march on September 20, 2019 in New York City.
Students participate in the Global Climate Strike march on September 20, 2019 in New York City. Photo: Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty

Please, for the love of God, let the teens vote.

Sure, calls to lower the voting age have come to resemble storm patterns that we’ve learned to anticipate from a distance. It’s now familiar, even predictable, to see a ripple of op-eds arguing for a lower voting age in the wake of any national event, be it a shooting, a climate march, or a school walkout.

It’s almost as if circumstances are trying to tell us something.

As things stand, minors are shut out of our political process. As a result, they’re forced to act extrapolitically — scheduling international marches, sit-ins in Congress, and various fundraisers. But it would be incorrect to imply that the kids deserve a vote for demonstrating that they care. Political representation isn’t a bone we toss to reward high-profile tricks that demonstrate civic worthiness, nor should it be. This is an argument about urgency, not indulgence. Sixteen-year-olds need to vote because our democracy demands it.

There are, in fact, no good reasons to continue prohibiting 16-year-olds from voting. And yet, an overwhelming proportion of Americans are opposed to the very thought. These…

--

--

Kelli María Korducki
GEN
Writer for

Writer, editor. This is where I post about ideas, strategies, and the joys of making an NYC-viable living as a self-employed creative.