Amy Coney Barrett Would Destroy Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Legacy

And that’s exactly why President Trump would nominate her

Christine Grimaldi
GEN

--

Photo: Library of Congress/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images

For nearly two years, I’ve made doomsday predictions about federal judge Amy Coney Barrett assuming Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. Well, doomsday is here. Barrett’s name began circulating as a top contender for the lifetime job within hours of Ginsburg’s death on Friday. By Saturday afternoon, Trump said that his nominee would “most likely” be a woman.

Barrett is one of the 216 and counting Trump-appointed federal judges the Republican-controlled Senate has confirmed to lifetime seats, many of which Majority Leader Mitch McConnell held open through the Obama years. She fit into the new generation of overwhelmingly white, mostly male, extremely conservative, and comparatively young lifetime federal judges transforming the courts for the next generation. (Barrett is 48 years old.) Unlike Ginsburg, who spent 13 years as an appeals court judge before being elevated to the Supreme Court, Barrett — formerly a law professor — has been on the bench for less than three years.

Back in October 2018, I believed Trump might rescind Brett Kavanaugh’s embattled Supreme Court nomination and submit Barrett’s name to the Senate instead. The SCOTUS switcheroo would solve two problems…

--

--

Christine Grimaldi
GEN
Writer for

I’m a Washington, D.C.-based journalist covering reproductive and LGBTQ policy under Congress and Trump. I write essays, too. She/her are my pronouns.